GRID P40-6Q vs Radeon HD 4770
GRID P40-6Q
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-6Q is positioned at rank 396 and the Radeon HD 4770 is on rank 149, so the Radeon HD 4770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-6Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-6Q.
| Insight | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4770 holds the technical lead. Priced at $109 (vs $150), it costs 27% less, resulting in a 38.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($109) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-6Q and Radeon HD 4770
GRID P40-6Q
The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.
Radeon HD 4770
The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-6Q scores 905 and the Radeon HD 4770 reaches 909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-6Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 4770 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 640 (Radeon HD 4770). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q) vs 0.96 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4770).
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 905 | 909 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+140% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+138% | 0.96 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID P40-6Q) vs 128 KB (Radeon HD 4770) — the GRID P40-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+19% | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-6Q draws 225W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Radeon HD 4770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-6Q) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 203mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 80W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 203mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.0 | 11.4+185% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-6Q launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109 and now averages $109. The Radeon HD 4770 costs 27.3% less ($41 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (GRID P40-6Q) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the Radeon HD 4770 offers 38.3% better value. The GRID P40-6Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GRID P40-6Q | Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $109-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $109-27% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 8.3+38% |
| Codename | GK104 | RV740 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | April 28 2009 |
| Ranking | #628 | #908 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-6Q and Radeon HD 4770
