Radeon R5 M230 vs GeForce GT625M
Radeon R5 M230
Popular choices:
GeForce GT625M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M230 is positioned at rank 468 and the GeForce GT625M is on rank 195, so the GeForce GT625M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M230
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT625M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 M230 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT625M.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M230 | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 M230 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 M230 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $45), it costs 44% less, resulting in a 81.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M230 | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+81.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M230 and GeForce GT625M
Radeon R5 M230
The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.
GeForce GT625M
The GeForce GT625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 422 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M230 scores 425 and the GeForce GT625M reaches 422 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M230 is built on GCN while the GeForce GT625M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230) vs 384 (GeForce GT625M).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 425 | 422 |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 M230 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT625M has 512 MB. The Radeon R5 M230 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M230 draws 75W versus the GeForce GT625M's 45W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M230) vs 350W (GeForce GT625M). Power connectors: Mobile vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 45W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.7 | 9.4+65% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M230 costs 44.4% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.0 (Radeon R5 M230) vs 9.4 (GeForce GT625M) — the Radeon R5 M230 offers 80.9% better value. The Radeon R5 M230 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | GeForce GT625M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-44% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0+81% | 9.4 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GK107 |
| Release | June 9 2015 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #522 | #828 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 M230 and GeForce GT625M
