CPU
GPU
Radeon R5 M230
Popular choices:
Quadro 410
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M230 is positioned at rank 468 and the Quadro 410 is on rank 251, so the Quadro 410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M230
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 410 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 M230 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M230 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 410 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 410 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $25), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M230 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M230 and Quadro 410
Radeon R5 M230
The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.
Quadro 410
The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M230 scores 425 and the Quadro 410 reaches 427 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M230 is built on GCN while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 425 | 427 |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1152+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 M230 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 410 has 512 MB. The Radeon R5 M230 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M230 draws 75W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R5 M230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M230) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 5.7+33% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Quadro 410 launched at $149 and now averages $25. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 17.0 (Radeon R5 M230) vs 17.1 (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 offers 0.6% better value. The Radeon R5 M230 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M230 | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-46% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0 | 17.1 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GK104 |
| Release | June 9 2015 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #522 | #604 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 M230 and Quadro 410
