Radeon R5 M255 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon R5 M255
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R5 M255 is positioned at rank #553 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M255
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 M255 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5715.5% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M255.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M255 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5715.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5715.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 195.7% better value per dollar than the Radeon R5 M255.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M255 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+195.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M255 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon R5 M255
The Radeon R5 M255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $799.99.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R5 M255 scores 543 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 5715.5%. The Radeon R5 M255 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R5 M255) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M255) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M255 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 543 | 31,578+5715% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 7680+1100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+3286% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 2610 MHz+182% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 40 | 240+500% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 7.5 MB+4588% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 48 MB+19100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R5 M255 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M255 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R5 M255 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 M255) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M255 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 48 MB+19100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R5 M255) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M255 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R5 M255) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R5 M255) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M255 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M255 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 116.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M255 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M255) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M255 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-74% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 7.2 | 110.8+1439% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M255 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The Radeon R5 M255 costs 94.9% less ($560 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.1 (Radeon R5 M255) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 195.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M255 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-81% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-95% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.1 | 53.5+196% |
| Codename | Venus | AD104 |
| Release | January 28 2014 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #851 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 M255 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
