Radeon R5 M255 vs Radeon R5 M335

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 M255 vs Radeon R5 M335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 M255 vs Radeon R5 M335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 M255

2014

Why buy it

✅23.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M335

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M255 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M255 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M335 instead at 549 vs 543, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 M255 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M335 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $150 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.1% (3.7 vs 3.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M335 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R5 M255 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R5 M255 vs Radeon R5 M335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 M255

The Radeon R5 M255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $799.99.

Radeon R5 M335

The Radeon R5 M335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 549 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 M255 scores 543 and the Radeon R5 M335 reaches 549 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M255 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M335 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R5 M255) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M335). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M255) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M335). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R5 M255	Radeon R5 M335
G3D Mark Score	543	549+1%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+100%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.184 TFLOPS+80%	0.6592 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	925 MHz	1030 MHz+11%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+100%	20
L1 Cache	160 KB+100%	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R5 M255	Radeon R5 M335
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M255 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M335. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R5 M255) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M335) — the Radeon R5 M255 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R5 M255	Radeon R5 M335
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 M255 draws 75W versus the Radeon R5 M335's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R5 M335 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M255) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M335). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon R5 M255	Radeon R5 M335
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	Mobile
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	7.2	7.3+1%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 M255 came in at $150, while the Radeon R5 M335 launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (Radeon R5 M255) vs 3.7 (Radeon R5 M335) — the Radeon R5 M335 offers 2.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M335 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R5 M255	Radeon R5 M335
MSRP	$150	$150
Performance per Dollar	3.6	3.7+3%
Codename	Venus	Jet
Release	January 28 2014	May 15 2016
Ranking	#851	#922

Search Radeon R5 M255 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.