Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Radeon R5 M435
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 M435 is positioned at rank 450 and the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is on rank 313, so the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M435
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 M435 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M.
| Insight | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R5 M435 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 M435 and Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Radeon R5 M435
The Radeon R5 M435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 860 points.
Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 853 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M435 scores 860 and the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M reaches 853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M435 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 M435) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M435) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 860 | 853 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 640+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6592 TFLOPS | 0.992 TFLOPS+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz+33% | 775 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 20 | 40+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 160 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 M435) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) — the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M435 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M435) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 17.1+49% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 M435 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | Jet | Venus |
| Release | May 15 2016 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #922 | #745 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R5 M435 and Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
