
Radeon R5 M435

Radeon R7 A10-8750
Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R5 M435
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-8750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.
Radeon R7 A10-8750
2016Why buy it
- ✅12.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R5 M435
The Radeon R5 M435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 860 points.

Radeon R7 A10-8750
The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R5 M435 scores 860 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 reaches 856 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M435 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 M435) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M435) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750).
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 860 | 856 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 512+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6592 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+24% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 20 | 32+60% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M435 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8750. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 M435) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon R7 A10-8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 M435 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8750's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M435) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 55W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 15.6+36% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R5 M435 came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M435 was 40% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.7 (Radeon R5 M435) vs 3.4 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon R5 M435 offers 67.6% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R5 M435 | Radeon R7 A10-8750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-40% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.7+68% | 3.4 |
| Codename | Jet | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 15 2016 | July 6 2016 |
| Ranking | #922 | #667 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













