Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750

AMD

Radeon R5 M435

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8750

2016Core: 800 MHz

Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R5 M435

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 67.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-8750 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Radeon R7 A10-8750

2016

Why buy it

  • 12.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A10-8750 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M435 instead at 860 vs 856, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R5 M435 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 M435 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 67.4% (5.7 vs 3.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 A10-8750 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R5 M435 vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R5 M435

The Radeon R5 M435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 860 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8750

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 M435 scores 860 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 reaches 856 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 M435 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 320 (Radeon R5 M435) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Raw compute: 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M435) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750).

FeatureRadeon R5 M435Radeon R7 A10-8750
G3D Mark Score
860
856
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
320
512+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6592 TFLOPS
0.8192 TFLOPS+24%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
20
32+60%
L1 Cache
80 KB
128 KB+60%
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 M435Radeon R7 A10-8750
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M435 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8750. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon R5 M435) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon R7 A10-8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5 M435Radeon R7 A10-8750
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
128 KB
256 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 M435 draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8750's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 M435) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

FeatureRadeon R5 M435Radeon R7 A10-8750
TDP
75W
55W-27%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Perf/Watt
11.5
15.6+36%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R5 M435 came in at $150, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R5 M435 was 40% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.7 (Radeon R5 M435) vs 3.4 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon R5 M435 offers 67.6% better value.

FeatureRadeon R5 M435Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP
$150-40%
$250
Performance per Dollar
5.7+68%
3.4
Codename
Jet
Cape Verde
Release
May 15 2016
July 6 2016
Ranking
#922
#667

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.