
Radeon 520

Radeon R5 M435
Radeon 520 vs Radeon R5 M435 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 520 vs Radeon R5 M435 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon 520 vs Radeon R5 M435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 520
2017Why buy it
- ✅26.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $72 less on MSRP ($78 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($78 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon R5 M435
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 520 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌92.3% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$78 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $78 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 520 vs Radeon R5 M435 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 520
The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R5 M435
The Radeon R5 M435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 860 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 520 scores 874 and the Radeon R5 M435 reaches 860 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 520 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R5 M435 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 520) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M435). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 520) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M435). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 520 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 874+2% | 860 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+60% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS+84% | 0.6592 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz+15% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+60% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 520 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 520 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M435. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon 520) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M435) — the Radeon 520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 520 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 520 draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 M435's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon 520) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M435). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 520 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5+52% | 11.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon 520 came in at $78, while the Radeon R5 M435 launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon 520 was 48% cheaper ($72 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (Radeon 520) vs 5.7 (Radeon R5 M435) — the Radeon 520 offers 96.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 520 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 520 | Radeon R5 M435 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $78-48% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2+96% | 5.7 |
| Codename | Lexa | Jet |
| Release | April 20 2017 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #668 | #922 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














