Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon 520

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon 520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 50W, a 43W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $78 MSRP).

Radeon 520

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($78 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 520 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌614.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (892 vs 874), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon 520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.

Radeon 520

The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU scores 892 and the Radeon 520 reaches 874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon 520
G3D Mark Score	892+2%	874
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon 520
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 520 carries 512 MB. Radeon 520 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU and 64-bit on the Radeon 520.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon 520
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon 520's 50W — a 150.9% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 250W (Radeon 520). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon 520
TDP	7W-86%	50W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	250W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Perf/Watt	127.4+628%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU came in at $0, while the Radeon 520 launched at $78. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU was 100+% cheaper ($78 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 11.2 (Radeon 520) — the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU (2018 vs 2017).

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon 520
MSRP	$0-100%	$78
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	11.2
Codename	—	Lexa
Release	December 6 2018	April 20 2017
Ranking	#915	#668

Search Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU on Amazon

Search Radeon 520 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.