
Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon 6750M

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon 6750M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 6750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 6750M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU and Radeon 6750M
Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.

Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU scores 892 and the Radeon 6750M reaches 911 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 892 | 911+2% |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 6750M has 512 MB. The Radeon 6750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon 6750M's 35W — a 133.3% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 350W (Radeon 6750M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-80% | 35W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 127.4+390% | 26.0 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) — the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | Radeon 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 36.4 |
| Codename | — | Whistler |
| Release | December 6 2018 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #915 | #905 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












