GRID K220Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K220Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID K220Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K220Q
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($469 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID K220Q is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌3114.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 7W.
Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 225W, a 218W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $469 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K220Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID K220Q
The GRID K220Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 2 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points. Launch price was $469.
Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K220Q scores 912 and the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU reaches 892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 912+2% | 892 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K220Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU carries 0 MB. GRID K220Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K220Q and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K220Q draws 225W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU's 7W — a 187.9% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K220Q) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 7W-97% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 265mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 127.4+3007% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K220Q came in at $469, while the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU launched at $0. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU was 100+% cheaper ($469 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GRID K220Q) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID K220Q | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $469 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK104 | — |
| Release | July 2 2014 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #907 | #915 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K220Q and Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
