Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

2018

Why buy it

  • Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 7W instead of 15W, a 8W reduction.
  • More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 114.3% higher power demand at 15W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (906 vs 892), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU has the stronger long-term case.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

The Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 906 points.

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU scores 892 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
G3D Mark Score
892
906+2%
Process Node
7 nm
14 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU and System on the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 72.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
TDP
7W-53%
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Perf/Watt
127.4+111%
60.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU came in at $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U offers NaN% better value.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
December 6 2018
January 7 2018
Ranking
#915
#831

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.