Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
VS
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

2018
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU.

InsightQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Vega (2017−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

The Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 906 points.

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU scores 892 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
G3D Mark Score
892
906+2%
Process Node
7 nm
14 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 72.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
TDP
7W-53%
15W
Recommended PSU
1W
1W
Power Connector
Integrated
Integrated
Perf/Watt
127.4+111%
60.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U offers NaN% better value.

FeatureQualcomm Adreno 680 GPURadeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Vega Raven Ridge
Release
December 6 2018
January 7 2018
Ranking
#915
#831