Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon HD 4770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon HD 4770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon HD 4770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 80W, a 73W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4770

2009

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 4770 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌1042.9% higher power demand at 80W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 4770 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (909 vs 892), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 4770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs Radeon HD 4770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU scores 892 and the Radeon HD 4770 reaches 909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
G3D Mark Score	892	909+2%
Process Node	7 nm	40 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4770 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4770 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4770.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 167.8% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
TDP	7W-91%	80W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	400W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Length	—	203mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	72°C
Perf/Watt	127.4+1018%	11.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU was 100+% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU (2018 vs 2009).

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
MSRP	$0-100%	$109
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	8.3
Codename	—	RV740
Release	December 6 2018	April 28 2009
Ranking	#915	#908

Search Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4770 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.