Iris Graphics 6100
Radeon 520
Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon 520 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon 520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon 520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Graphics 6100
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $78 MSRP).
Radeon 520
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($78 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Graphics 6100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 520 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Graphics 6100 vs Radeon 520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Iris Graphics 6100
The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.
Radeon 520
The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Graphics 6100 scores 899 and the Radeon 520 reaches 874 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Graphics 6100 is built on Generation 8.0 while the Radeon 520 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 512 (Radeon 520). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 520). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon 520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 899+3% | 874 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+58% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1183 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 6 | 16+167% |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon 520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Graphics 6100 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 520 carries 512 MB. Radeon 520 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Graphics 6100 and 64-bit on the Radeon 520.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon 520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Graphics 6100 draws 15W versus the Radeon 520's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Graphics 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 250W (Radeon 520). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon 520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 250W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 59.9+242% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Graphics 6100 came in at $0, while the Radeon 520 launched at $78. On MSRP, Iris Graphics 6100 was 100+% cheaper ($78 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) vs 11.2 (Radeon 520) — the Iris Graphics 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 520 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Iris Graphics 6100 | Radeon 520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $78 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 11.2 |
| Codename | Broadwell GT3 | Lexa |
| Release | January 5 2015 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #913 | #668 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Graphics 6100 and Radeon 520
