Radeon R5E
VS
GeForce 240M GT

Radeon R5E vs GeForce 240M GT

AMD

Radeon R5E

2013Core: 800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 240M GT

#565
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3393%
#567
3076%
#568
3067%
#572
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2789%
#573
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2770%
#575
GeForce 240M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
100%
#576
100%
#577
GeForce 310
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
99%
#578
99%
#579
Radeon R5 M320
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#580
GeForce 9600 GT
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
99%
#581
99%
#582
Radeon HD 8650G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#583
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#584
Radeon Vega 10
MSRP: $499|Avg: $100
95%
#585
94%
#586
Radeon R7 M440
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#588
Mobility Radeon HD 4350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#589
GeForce 405
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
92%
#590
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 240M GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5E.

InsightRadeon R5EGeForce 240M GT
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 240M GT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 240M GT holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $49), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 895.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R5EGeForce 240M GT
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+895.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5E and GeForce 240M GT

AMD

Radeon R5E

The Radeon R5E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 315 points. Launch price was $109.

NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5E scores 315 and the GeForce 240M GT reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5E is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 240M GT uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R5E) vs 384 (GeForce 240M GT). Raw compute: 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R5E) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT).

FeatureRadeon R5EGeForce 240M GT
G3D Mark Score
315
320+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8192 TFLOPS
0.9032 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB
192 KB+50%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5EGeForce 240M GT
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R5E) vs 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) — the GeForce 240M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R5EGeForce 240M GT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R5E) vs 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon R5EGeForce 240M GT
DirectX
12 (12_0)+19%
10.1
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R5E) vs None (GeForce 240M GT). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R5E) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT).

FeatureRadeon R5EGeForce 240M GT
Encoder
VCE 2.0
None
Decoder
UVD 4.2
PureVideo VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5E draws 15W versus the GeForce 240M GT's 33W — a 75% difference. The Radeon R5E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Radeon R5E) vs 350W (GeForce 240M GT). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon R5EGeForce 240M GT
TDP
15W-55%
33W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
21.0+116%
9.7
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5E launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 240M GT launched at $100 and now averages $5. The GeForce 240M GT costs 89.8% less ($44 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.4 (Radeon R5E) vs 64.0 (GeForce 240M GT) — the GeForce 240M GT offers 900% better value. The GeForce 240M GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R5EGeForce 240M GT
MSRP
$0-100%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$49
$5-90%
Performance per Dollar
6.4
64.0+900%
Codename
Cape Verde
GM108
Release
December 20 2013
March 13 2015
Ranking
#738
#847