GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce 240M GT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

100%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

96%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

95%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

95%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

95%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

94%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

93%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

93%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

92%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

91%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

90%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

90%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

89%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

88%

#15

Radeon RX 6500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $150

88%

#16

GeForce RTX 3070

MSRP: $499|Avg: $200

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 240M GT

#565

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

3393%

#567

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3076%

#568

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3067%

#572

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

2789%

#573

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

2770%

#575

GeForce 240M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

100%

#576

Radeon HD 8450G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#577

GeForce 310

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

99%

#578

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

99%

#579

Radeon R5 M320

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#580

GeForce 9600 GT

MSRP: $149|Avg: $20

99%

#581

Radeon HD 7620G + HD 8600M Dual

MSRP: $140|Avg: $30

99%

#582

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600M Dual

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

96%

#583

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#584

Radeon Vega 10

MSRP: $499|Avg: $100

95%

#585

Radeon HD 8450G + HD 8600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $35

94%

#586

Radeon R7 M440

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

94%

#588

Mobility Radeon HD 4350

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

93%

#589

GeForce 405

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

92%

#590

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 240M GT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6247.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 240M GT.

Insight	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 240M GT
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+6247.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6247.5%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $5), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 13.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce 240M GT.

Insight	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 240M GT
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+13.3%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)	✅More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

GeForce 240M GT Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and GeForce 240M GT

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GeForce 240M GT's 320 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 6247.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce 240M GT uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 384 (GeForce 240M GT). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1176 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 240M GT
G3D Mark Score	20,312+6248%	320
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4864+1167%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+1694%	0.9032 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+42%	1176 MHz
ROPs	80+900%	8
TMUs	152+533%	24
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+2426%	0.19 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce 240M GT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 240M GT
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2.0	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 240M GT has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 240M GT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 240M GT
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)+19%	10.1
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs None (GeForce 240M GT). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 240M GT
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	None
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GeForce 240M GT's 33W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce 240M GT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	GeForce 240M GT
TDP	200W	33W-84%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	Legacy
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	101.6+947%	9.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GeForce 240M GT launched at $100 and now averages $5. The GeForce 240M GT costs 98.2% less ($275 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 64.0 (GeForce 240M GT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 13.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).