
Radeon R6 M340DX vs GeForce MX130

Radeon R6 M340DX
Popular choices:

GeForce MX130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R6 M340DX.
| Insight | Radeon R6 M340DX | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R6 M340DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R6 M340DX holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $50), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 398.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R6 M340DX | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+398.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R6 M340DX and GeForce MX130

Radeon R6 M340DX
The Radeon R6 M340DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 955 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,800 points.

GeForce MX130
The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R6 M340DX scores 1,800 and the GeForce MX130 reaches 1,805 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R6 M340DX is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce MX130 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs 384 (GeForce MX130). Raw compute: 0.791 TFLOPS (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 1242 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,800 | 1,805 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.791 TFLOPS | 0.9539 TFLOPS+21% |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz | 1242 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 192 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs 1 MB (GeForce MX130) — the GeForce MX130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R6 M340DX draws 30W versus the GeForce MX130's 30W — a 0% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs 350W (GeForce MX130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 60.0 | 60.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R6 M340DX launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce MX130 launched at $120 and now averages $50. The Radeon R6 M340DX costs 80% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 180.0 (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs 36.1 (GeForce MX130) — the Radeon R6 M340DX offers 398.6% better value. The GeForce MX130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | GeForce MX130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $120 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 180.0+399% | 36.1 |
| Codename | Jet | GM108 |
| Release | December 12 2015 | November 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #852 | #713 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















