Radeon R6 M340DX vs Iris Plus Graphics 950
Radeon R6 M340DX
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R6 M340DX is significantly newer (2015 vs 0). The Radeon R6 M340DX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R6 M340DX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 950.
| Insight | Radeon R6 M340DX | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R6 M340DX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R6 M340DX and Iris Plus Graphics 950
Radeon R6 M340DX
The Radeon R6 M340DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 955 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,800 points.
Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R6 M340DX scores 1,800 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R6 M340DX is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.791 TFLOPS (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 1030 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,800 | 1,789 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.791 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 1030 MHz+3% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R6 M340DX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The Radeon R6 M340DX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs Quick Sync 7.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | Quick Sync 7 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | Quick Sync 7 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R6 M340DX draws 30W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 60.0 | 119.3+99% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R6 M340DX launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 180.0 (Radeon R6 M340DX) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R6 M340DX | Iris Plus Graphics 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 180.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | Jet | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | December 12 2015 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #852 | #634 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R6 M340DX and Iris Plus Graphics 950
