Radeon R7 250X vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
Radeon R7 250X
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 560M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 560M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 250X.
| Insight | Radeon R7 250X | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 250X and GeForce GTX 560M SLI
Radeon R7 250X
The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.
GeForce GTX 560M SLI
The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,274 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 250X scores 2,269 and the GeForce GTX 560M SLI reaches 2,274 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 250X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 560M SLI uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R7 250X) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 560M SLI).
| Feature | Radeon R7 250X | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,269 | 2,274 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 250X | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250X | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 72 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R7 250X) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M SLI). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250X | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250X) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 560M SLI). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M SLI).
| Feature | Radeon R7 250X | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 250X draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 560M SLI's 100W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon R7 250X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon R7 250X) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 560M SLI). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | Radeon R7 250X | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-20% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-22% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 28.4+25% | 22.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 250X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R7 250X | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | Cape Verde | N12E-GS |
| Release | February 13 2014 | January 6 2011 |
| Ranking | #655 | #632 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 250X and GeForce GTX 560M SLI
