Radeon R7 250X vs RadeonT 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 250X vs RadeonT 660M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 250X vs RadeonT 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 250X

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT 660M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 80W vs 40W.

RadeonT 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅43.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 80W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RadeonT 660M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 250X instead at 2,269 vs 2,221, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 250X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 660M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 250X vs RadeonT 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 250X

The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.

RadeonT 660M

The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 250X scores 2,269 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 250X is built on GCN 1.0 while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R7 250X) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Raw compute: 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 250X	RadeonT 660M
G3D Mark Score	2,269+2%	2,221
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.216 TFLOPS	1.459 TFLOPS+20%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1900 MHz+90%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	160 KB+25%	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 250X	RadeonT 660M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250X and 64-bit on the RadeonT 660M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 250X) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 250X	RadeonT 660M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R7 250X) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R7 250X	RadeonT 660M
DirectX	12 (FL 11_1)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250X) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 660M). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M).

Feature	Radeon R7 250X	RadeonT 660M
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 4.2	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 250X draws 80W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 66.7% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon R7 250X) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R7 250X	RadeonT 660M
TDP	80W	40W-50%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	210mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	28.4	55.5+95%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 660M (2023 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon R7 250X	RadeonT 660M
MSRP	$99	—
Codename	Cape Verde	Rembrandt+
Release	February 13 2014	January 3 2023
Ranking	#655	#565

Search Radeon R7 250X on Amazon

Search RadeonT 660M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.