
Radeon HD 5970

Radeon R7 250X
Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon R7 250X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon R7 250X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon R7 250X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 5970
2009Why buy it
- ✅112.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌606.1% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 22.9 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌267.5% higher power demand at 294W vs 80W.
- ❌45.2% longer card at 305mm vs 210mm.
Radeon R7 250X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 597.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 294W, a 214W reduction.
- ✅Measures 210mm instead of 305mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5970 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon R7 250X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 5970
The Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,297 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon R7 250X
The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5970 scores 2,297 and the Radeon R7 250X reaches 2,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5970 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,297+1% | 2,269 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600 ×2+150% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.32 TFLOPS ×2+91% | 1.216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80 ×2+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5970 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 5970) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon HD 5970 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 72 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R7 250X). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (FL 11_1)+7% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 5970) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250X). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5970) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5970 draws 294W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 114.4% difference. The Radeon R7 250X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon HD 5970) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 305mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 294W | 80W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 305mm | 210mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 70°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 28.4+264% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 5970 came in at $699, while the Radeon R7 250X launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250X was 85.8% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.3 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 22.9 (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon R7 250X offers 593.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 250X (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $99-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | 22.9+594% |
| Codename | Hemlock | Cape Verde |
| Release | November 18 2009 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #651 | #655 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














