
FirePro W6150M

Radeon HD 5970
FirePro W6150M vs Radeon HD 5970 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W6150M vs Radeon HD 5970 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W6150M vs Radeon HD 5970: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W6150M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 294W, a 144W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 305mm, a 223mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5970
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌96% higher power demand at 294W vs 150W.
- ❌272% longer card at 305mm vs 82mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W6150M vs Radeon HD 5970 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W6150M
The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.

Radeon HD 5970
The Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,297 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W6150M scores 2,358 and the Radeon HD 5970 reaches 2,297 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W6150M is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon HD 5970 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W6150M) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5970). Raw compute: 1.651 TFLOPS (FirePro W6150M) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5970).
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,358+3% | 2,297 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1600 ×2+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.651 TFLOPS | 2.32 TFLOPS ×2+41% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 80 ×2+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W6150M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5970 carries 2 GB. FirePro W6150M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W6150M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5970. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W6150M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5970) — the Radeon HD 5970 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5970). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_0)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M) vs None (Radeon HD 5970). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5970).
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W6150M draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 5970's 294W — a 64.9% difference. The FirePro W6150M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W6150M) vs 650W (Radeon HD 5970). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 305mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90.
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-49% | 294W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 82mm | 305mm |
| Height | 105mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 15.7+101% | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is FirePro W6150M (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | FirePro W6150M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $699 |
| Codename | Saturn | Hemlock |
| Release | November 12 2015 | November 18 2009 |
| Ranking | #646 | #651 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















