
Radeon HD 5970

Radeon Pro
Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon Pro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 5970
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 294W vs 250W.
- ❌26.6% longer card at 305mm vs 241mm.
Radeon Pro
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Radeon HD 5970 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 294W, a 44W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 305mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 5970
The Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,297 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon Pro
The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5970 scores 2,297 and the Radeon Pro reaches 2,366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5970 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Pro uses GCN 5.1, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro). Raw compute: 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,297 | 2,366+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600 ×2 | 3840+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 | 13.06 TFLOPS+463% |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 ×2 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 960 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5970 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5970) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 5970) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12_0+7% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 5970) vs Unified Video Decoder (Radeon Pro). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs Unified Video Decoder.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Unified Video Decoder |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | Unified Video Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5970 draws 294W versus the Radeon Pro's 250W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon HD 5970) vs 350W (Radeon Pro). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 294W | 250W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 9.5+22% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 5970 came in at $699, while the Radeon Pro launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro was 100+% cheaper ($699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.3 (Radeon HD 5970) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro (2020 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5970 | Radeon Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | Hemlock | Vega 20 |
| Release | November 18 2009 | May 13 2020 |
| Ranking | #651 | #194 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














