
GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon HD 5970

GeForce GTX 485M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5970
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 485M is positioned at rank #112 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 485M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 485M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 5970.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (305mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 485M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon HD 5970

GeForce GTX 485M
The GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,360 points.

Radeon HD 5970
The Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,297 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 485M scores 2,360 and the Radeon HD 5970 reaches 2,297 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 5970 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5970). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5970).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,360+3% | 2,297 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1600 ×2+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8832 TFLOPS | 2.32 TFLOPS ×2+163% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80 ×2+25% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+60% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5970). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.4+10% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs None (Radeon HD 5970). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5970).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 485M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 5970's 294W — a 98.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 650W (Radeon HD 5970). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 90.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-66% | 294W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 305mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 23.6+203% | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 485M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | GF104 | Hemlock |
| Release | January 5 2011 | November 18 2009 |
| Ranking | #645 | #651 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















