GeForce GTX 485M vs GeForce MX330

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M

2011Core: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce MX330

2020Core: 1531 MHzBoost: 1594 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 485M vs GeForce MX330 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 485M vs GeForce MX330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 485M vs GeForce MX330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 485M

2011

Why buy it

  • 55.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 900% higher power demand at 100W vs 10W.

GeForce MX330

2020

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce GTX 485M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX330 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 10W instead of 100W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 485M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 485M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 55.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (2,360 vs 2,350), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX330 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX330 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 485M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 485M vs GeForce MX330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M

The GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,360 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX330

The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 485M scores 2,360 and the GeForce MX330 reaches 2,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M is built on Fermi while the GeForce MX330 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 384 (GeForce MX330). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGeForce MX330
G3D Mark Score
2,360
2,350
Architecture
Fermi
Pascal
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8832 TFLOPS
1.224 TFLOPS+39%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+167%
24
L1 Cache
512 KB+256%
144 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGeForce MX330
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 485M and 64-bit on the GeForce MX330.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGeForce MX330
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
48 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 12 (GeForce MX330). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGeForce MX330
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.0
4.6+15%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs Pascal (GeForce MX330). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce MX330).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGeForce MX330
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
Pascal
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 485M draws 100W versus the GeForce MX330's 10W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 350W (GeForce MX330). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGeForce MX330
TDP
100W
10W-90%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
23.6
235.0+896%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce MX330 (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGeForce MX330
MSRP
$150
Codename
GF104
GP108
Release
January 5 2011
February 10 2020
Ranking
#645
#647

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.