GeForce GTX 485M
VS
P106-090

GeForce GTX 485M vs P106-090

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M

2011Core: 1150 MHz
VS

P106-090

2017Core: 1354 MHzBoost: 1531 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 485M is positioned at rank 112 and the P106-090 is on rank 184, so the GeForce GTX 485M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 485M

#102
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
276%
#104
250%
#105
250%
#109
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
227%
#110
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
225%
#112
GeForce GTX 485M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#114
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
MSRP: $179|Avg: $40
99%
#116
GeForce GTX 880M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
97%
#117
GeForce MX570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $120
97%
#118
Radeon RX 6500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
97%
#119
GeForce 825M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
97%
#121
Radeon HD 6970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $48
96%
#123
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#126
GeForce GT 550M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar P106-090

#81
Tesla T10
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975
99%
#82
RTX A5000
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800
97%
#83
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200
96%
#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
95%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
92%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
88%
#168
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2330%
#183
FirePro W7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $114
100%
#184
P106-090
MSRP: $389|Avg: $30
100%
#185
Radeon Pro WX 4130
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
99%
#187
Tesla M6
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $84
98%
#189
CMP 30HX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $60
97%
#190
FirePro W2100
MSRP: $139|Avg: $30
97%
#192
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
96%
#195
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
92%
#196
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The P106-090 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The P106-090 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 485M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The P106-090 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 485M.

InsightGeForce GTX 485MP106-090
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%)
Leading raw performance (+4.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (250mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the P106-090 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 485M and P106-090

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M

The GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,360 points.

NVIDIA

P106-090

The P106-090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 31 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1354 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,466 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 485M scores 2,360 and the P106-090 reaches 2,466 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M is built on Fermi while the P106-090 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 768 (P106-090). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 2.352 TFLOPS (P106-090).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MP106-090
G3D Mark Score
2,360
2,466+4%
Architecture
Fermi
Pascal
Process Node
40 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8832 TFLOPS
2.352 TFLOPS+166%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
64+33%
48
L1 Cache
512 KB+78%
288 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.5 MB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MP106-090
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 1.5 MB (P106-090) — the P106-090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MP106-090
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1.5 MB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 12 (P106-090). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MP106-090
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.0
4.6+15%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs NVENC (Pascal) (P106-090). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (P106-090).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MP106-090
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 485M draws 100W versus the P106-090's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The P106-090 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 350W (P106-090). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MP106-090
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
250mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
60°C-33%
Perf/Watt
23.6
32.9+39%
💰

Value Analysis

The P106-090 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MP106-090
MSRP
$389
Avg Price (30d)
$30
Codename
GF104
GP106
Release
January 5 2011
July 31 2017
Ranking
#645
#639