GeForce GTX 485M vs GRID M10-1Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M

2011Core: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID M10-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 485M vs GRID M10-1Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 485M vs GRID M10-1Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 485M

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M10-1Q

2015

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID M10-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (2,385 vs 2,360), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 485M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M10-1Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M10-1Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 485M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 485M vs GRID M10-1Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 485M

The GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,360 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-1Q

The GRID M10-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,385 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 485M scores 2,360 and the GRID M10-1Q reaches 2,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M is built on Fermi while the GRID M10-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-1Q). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-1Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGRID M10-1Q
G3D Mark Score
2,360
2,385+1%
Architecture
Fermi
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8832 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+446%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 485M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M10-1Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGRID M10-1Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 485M and 64-bit on the GRID M10-1Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-1Q) — the GRID M10-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGRID M10-1Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGRID M10-1Q
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_1
Max Displays
2
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 485M draws 100W versus the GRID M10-1Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 350W (GRID M10-1Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGRID M10-1Q
TDP
100W-56%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
23.6+123%
10.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID M10-1Q (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 485MGRID M10-1Q
MSRP
$0
Codename
GF104
GM204
Release
January 5 2011
August 30 2015
Ranking
#645
#525

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.