
GeForce GTX 485M

Radeon RX 550X
GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon RX 550X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon RX 550X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon RX 550X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 485M
2011Why buy it
- ✅66.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 550X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTX 485M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550X is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 485M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon RX 550X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 485M
The GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,360 points.

Radeon RX 550X
The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 485M scores 2,360 and the Radeon RX 550X reaches 2,381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550X). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,360 | 2,381 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8832 TFLOPS | 1.211 TFLOPS+37% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 485M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 485M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 550X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 485M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550X carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 550X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 485M and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550X.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 550X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs UVD (Radeon RX 550X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 485M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 550X's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 550X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 85°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.6 | 47.6+102% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon RX 550X (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | Radeon RX 550X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $109 |
| Codename | GF104 | Lexa |
| Release | January 5 2011 | December 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #645 | #642 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















