GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Pro

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 485M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro

2020

Why buy it

✅31.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅GeForce GTX 485M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 31.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (2,366 vs 2,360), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 485M

The GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,360 points.

Radeon Pro

The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 485M scores 2,360 and the Radeon Pro reaches 2,366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 485M is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro uses GCN 5.1, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro).

Feature	GeForce GTX 485M	Radeon Pro
G3D Mark Score	2,360	2,366
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 5.1
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	3840+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8832 TFLOPS	13.06 TFLOPS+1379%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	240+275%
L1 Cache	512 KB	960 KB+88%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 485M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 485M	Radeon Pro
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 485M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 485M	Radeon Pro
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 485M	Radeon Pro
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_0
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs Unified Video Decoder (Radeon Pro). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs Unified Video Decoder.

Feature	GeForce GTX 485M	Radeon Pro
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	Unified Video Decoder
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	Unified Video Decoder
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 485M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 485M	Radeon Pro
TDP	100W-60%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	241mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	23.6+148%	9.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro (2020 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 485M	Radeon Pro
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GF104	Vega 20
Release	January 5 2011	May 13 2020
Ranking	#645	#194

Search GeForce GTX 485M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.