
Radeon R7 430

Radeon R7 M460
Radeon R7 430 vs Radeon R7 M460 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 430 vs Radeon R7 M460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 430 vs Radeon R7 M460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 430
2015Why buy it
- ✅100.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 223.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.8 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Radeon R7 M460
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 430 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌216.5% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 13.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 430 vs Radeon R7 M460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 430
The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R7 M460
The Radeon R7 M460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,069 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 430 scores 1,093 and the Radeon R7 M460 reaches 1,069 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 430 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M460 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 430) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M460). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M460). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1125 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,093+2% | 1,069 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS+131% | 0.864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | 1125 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+167% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 430 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M460. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 430) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M460) — the Radeon R7 430 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 430 draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 M460's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R7 M460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 430) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M460). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 10.9 | 14.3+31% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 430 came in at $79, while the Radeon R7 M460 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R7 430 was 68.4% cheaper ($171 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.8 (Radeon R7 430) vs 4.3 (Radeon R7 M460) — the Radeon R7 430 offers 220.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M460 (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 430 | Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-68% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.8+221% | 4.3 |
| Codename | Trinidad | Meso |
| Release | June 18 2015 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #467 | #861 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















