Radeon R7 430 vs RadeonT 610M

AMD

Radeon R7 430

2015Boost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RadeonT 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 430 vs RadeonT 610M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 430 vs RadeonT 610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 430 vs RadeonT 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 430

2015

Why buy it

  • 53.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

RadeonT 610M

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 430 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 430 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 53.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (1,093 vs 1,068), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RadeonT 610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 430 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 430 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 610M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 430 vs RadeonT 610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 430

The Radeon R7 430 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 430 scores 1,093 and the RadeonT 610M reaches 1,068 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 430 is built on GCN 1.0 while the RadeonT 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 430) vs 128 (RadeonT 610M). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 430) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 430RadeonT 610M
G3D Mark Score
1,093+2%
1,068
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1024+700%
128
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS+255%
0.5632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
975 MHz
2200 MHz+126%
ROPs
32+700%
4
TMUs
64+700%
8
L1 Cache
256 KB+700%
32 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 430RadeonT 610M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 430 and 64-bit on the RadeonT 610M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 430) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 430RadeonT 610M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 430 draws 100W versus the RadeonT 610M's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon R7 430) vs 350W (RadeonT 610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 430RadeonT 610M
TDP
100W
15W-85%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
10.9
71.2+553%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 610M (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R7 430RadeonT 610M
MSRP
$79
Codename
Trinidad
Dragon Range
Release
June 18 2015
January 3 2023
Ranking
#467
#843

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.