
Radeon R7 A360
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 710
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A360 is positioned at rank 209 and the GeForce GT 710 is on rank 87, so the GeForce GT 710 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A360
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 710
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 710 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A360.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A360 | GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 710 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 710 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $55), it costs 9% less, resulting in a 10.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A360 | GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A360 and GeForce GT 710

Radeon R7 A360
The Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 616 points. Launch price was $109.

GeForce GT 710
The GeForce GT 710 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 619 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A360 scores 616 and the GeForce GT 710 reaches 619 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A360 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GeForce GT 710 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 A360) vs 384 (GeForce GT 710). Raw compute: 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A360) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 710).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 616 | 619 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.613 TFLOPS+112% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 A360 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 710 has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 710 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A360 draws 80W versus the GeForce GT 710's 64W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GT 710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A360) vs 300W (GeForce GT 710). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 64W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 55°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.7 | 9.7+26% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A360 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the GeForce GT 710 launched at $35 and now averages $50. The GeForce GT 710 costs 9.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.2 (Radeon R7 A360) vs 12.4 (GeForce GT 710) — the GeForce GT 710 offers 10.7% better value. The Radeon R7 A360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | GeForce GT 710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | $35-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | $50-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2 | 12.4+11% |
| Codename | Tobago | GK107 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #576 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












