Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon HD 7610M
Radeon R7 A360
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A360 is positioned at rank 209 and the Radeon HD 7610M is on rank 213, so the Radeon R7 A360 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A360
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A360.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 7610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A360 and Radeon HD 7610M
Radeon R7 A360
The Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 616 points. Launch price was $109.
Radeon HD 7610M
The Radeon HD 7610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 25 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 632 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A360 scores 616 and the Radeon HD 7610M reaches 632 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A360 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7610M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 A360) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7610M). Raw compute: 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A360) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7610M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 725 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 616 | 632+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+60% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.613 TFLOPS+132% | 0.696 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+38% | 725 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+300% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 A360 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7610M has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7610M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A360 draws 80W versus the Radeon HD 7610M's 20W — a 120% difference. The Radeon HD 7610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A360) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7610M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 20W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 7.7 | 31.6+310% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon HD 7610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | — |
| Codename | Tobago | Thames |
| Release | June 18 2015 | December 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #576 | #928 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A360 and Radeon HD 7610M
