Radeon R7 A360 vs Radeon R6 M255DX
Radeon R7 A360
Popular choices:
Radeon R6 M255DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 A360 is positioned at rank #209 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A360
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R6 M255DX.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R6 M255DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R6 M255DX holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $55), it costs 82% less, resulting in a 440.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+440.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A360 and Radeon R6 M255DX
Radeon R7 A360
The Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 616 points. Launch price was $109.
Radeon R6 M255DX
The Radeon R6 M255DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 605 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A360 scores 616 and the Radeon R6 M255DX reaches 605 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A360 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon R6 M255DX uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R7 A360) vs 896 (Radeon R6 M255DX).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 616+2% | 605 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 896+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A360 draws 80W versus the Radeon R6 M255DX's 30W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R6 M255DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A360) vs 350W (Radeon R6 M255DX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 30W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 7.7 | 20.2+162% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A360 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the Radeon R6 M255DX launched at $0 and now averages $10. The Radeon R6 M255DX costs 81.8% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.2 (Radeon R7 A360) vs 60.5 (Radeon R6 M255DX) — the Radeon R6 M255DX offers 440.2% better value. The Radeon R7 A360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A360 | Radeon R6 M255DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | $10-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2 | 60.5+440% |
| Codename | Tobago | — |
| Release | June 18 2015 | June 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #576 | #800 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A360 and Radeon R6 M255DX
