Radeon R7 A8-7670K
VS
HD Graphics 520

Radeon R7 A8-7670K vs HD Graphics 520

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

2015Boost: 975 MHz
VS

HD Graphics 520

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is positioned at rank 176 and the HD Graphics 520 is on rank 389, so the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7670K

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1010%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
971%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
959%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
958%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
956%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
950%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
938%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
935%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
926%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
924%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
913%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
911%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
894%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
894%
#93
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#94
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
95%
#95
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#161
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1114%
#176
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $50
100%
#177
Radeon HD 6570
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
98%
#178
Radeon HD 8370D
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
98%
#181
Radeon HD 8310E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#183
GeForce GT 610
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#185
Radeon HD 6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#186
Radeon HD 8450G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
93%
#187
Radeon HD 4830
MSRP: $130|Avg: $20
93%
#188
GeForce GT 140
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
93%
#189
GeForce GT 530
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
92%
#190
GeForce GT 620
MSRP: $59|Avg: $20
92%
#191
Radeon R7 A8-7600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $25
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 520

#379
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1261%
#381
1143%
#382
1140%
#386
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1037%
#387
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1030%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
100%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
99%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
98%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
98%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
93%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#404
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The HD Graphics 520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 A8-7670KHD Graphics 520
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The HD Graphics 520 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 520 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 45.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 A8-7670KHD Graphics 520
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+45.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A8-7670K and HD Graphics 520

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 847 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K scores 847 and the HD Graphics 520 reaches 861 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is built on GCN 1.0 while the HD Graphics 520 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) vs 192 (HD Graphics 520). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) vs 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KHD Graphics 520
G3D Mark Score
847
861+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Generation 9.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
1024+433%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS+478%
0.3456 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
975 MHz+8%
900 MHz
ROPs
32+967%
3
TMUs
64+167%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KHD Graphics 520
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 520 has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KHD Graphics 520
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K draws 100W versus the HD Graphics 520's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) vs 1W (HD Graphics 520). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KHD Graphics 520
TDP
100W
15W-85%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
8.5
57.4+575%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K launched at $118 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 and now averages $35. The HD Graphics 520 costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.9 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) vs 24.6 (HD Graphics 520) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 45.6% better value.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KHD Graphics 520
MSRP
$118
$100-15%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$35-30%
Performance per Dollar
16.9
24.6+46%
Codename
Trinidad
Skylake GT2
Release
June 18 2015
September 1 2015
Ranking
#467
#929