Radeon R7 A8-7670K vs Radeon R7 A10-8750

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

2015Boost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8750

2016Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 A8-7670K vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 A8-7670K vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 A8-7670K vs Radeon R7 A10-8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

2015

Why buy it

  • 86.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $132 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 109.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 3.4 G3D/$ ($118 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 81.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 55W.

Radeon R7 A10-8750

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 55W instead of 100W, a 45W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A8-7670K across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 111.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$118 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A8-7670K is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 86.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 A10-8750 instead at 856 vs 847, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 A8-7670K is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-7670K makes the most sense to buy today. It is $132 cheaper on MSRP at $118 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 109.6% (7.2 vs 3.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon R7 A8-7670K vs Radeon R7 A10-8750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 847 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Radeon R7 A10-8750

The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 856 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K scores 847 and the Radeon R7 A10-8750 reaches 856 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8750).

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KRadeon R7 A10-8750
G3D Mark Score
847
856+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024+100%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.997 TFLOPS+144%
0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KRadeon R7 A10-8750
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7670K and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8750. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon R7 A8-7670K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KRadeon R7 A10-8750
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8750's 55W — a 58.1% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8750). Power connectors: None vs None.

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KRadeon R7 A10-8750
TDP
100W
55W-45%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
8.5
15.6+84%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 A8-7670K came in at $118, while the Radeon R7 A10-8750 launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7670K was 52.8% cheaper ($132 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) vs 3.4 (Radeon R7 A10-8750) — the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers 111.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-8750 (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R7 A8-7670KRadeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP
$118-53%
$250
Performance per Dollar
7.2+112%
3.4
Codename
Trinidad
Cape Verde
Release
June 18 2015
July 6 2016
Ranking
#467
#667

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.