
Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is positioned at rank 313 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K is on rank 176, so the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 A8-7670K.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8500M/8700M and Radeon R7 A8-7670K

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 853 points.

Radeon R7 A8-7670K
The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 847 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M scores 853 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K reaches 847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 853 | 847 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1024+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.992 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+101% |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 975 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 256 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7670K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 12 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC (Partial),MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7670K's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.1+101% | 8.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M/8700M | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $118 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | Venus | Trinidad |
| Release | April 1 2013 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #745 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















