Radeon HD 8500M/8700M vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

AMD

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

2013Core: 725 MHzBoost: 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 295W, a 245W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023

Why buy it

  • 75.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 490% higher power demand at 295W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 75.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8500M/8700M instead at 853 vs 837, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 96 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 8500M/8700M

The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 853 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M scores 853 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 2495 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 8500M/8700MRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
G3D Mark Score
853+2%
837
Architecture
GCN 1.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
640
6144+860%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.992 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS+6081%
Boost Clock
775 MHz
2495 MHz+222%
ROPs
16
192+1100%
TMUs
40
384+860%
L1 Cache
0.16 MB
3 MB+1775%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
6 MB+2300%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8500M/8700MRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 8500M/8700M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 6 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8500M/8700MRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
6 MB+2300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 142% difference. The Radeon HD 8500M/8700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8500M/8700M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 8500M/8700MRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
TDP
50W-83%
295W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
17.1+511%
2.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 8500M/8700MRadeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP
$119
Codename
Venus
Navi 31
Release
April 1 2013
April 13 2023
Ranking
#745
#26

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.