HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K

HD Graphics 520

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

2015Boost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······

HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 520

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $18 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
  • Delivers 20% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

2015

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 A8-7670K is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 18% HIGHER MSRP
    $118 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($118 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
HD Graphics 520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (861 vs 847), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 A8-7670K is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics 520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $18 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $118, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 20% (8.6 vs 7.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, HD Graphics 520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 A8-7670K has the stronger long-term case.

HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 847 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 520 scores 861 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K reaches 847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 520 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 520) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Raw compute: 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
G3D Mark Score
861+2%
847
Architecture
Generation 9.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm+
28 nm
Shading Units
192
1024+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.3456 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+478%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
975 MHz+8%
ROPs
3
32+967%
TMUs
24
64+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 520 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 A8-7670K gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 520 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7670K.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 520 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7670K's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 520) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
57.4+575%
8.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 520 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K launched at $118. On MSRP, HD Graphics 520 was 15.3% cheaper ($18 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (HD Graphics 520) vs 7.2 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 19.4% better value.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP
$100-15%
$118
Performance per Dollar
8.6+19%
7.2
Codename
Skylake GT2
Trinidad
Release
September 1 2015
June 18 2015
Ranking
#929
#467

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.