
HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K

HD Graphics 520
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The HD Graphics 520 is positioned at rank 389 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K is on rank 176, so the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 520
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics 520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The HD Graphics 520 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 520 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 45.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+45.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 520 and Radeon R7 A8-7670K

HD Graphics 520
The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

Radeon R7 A8-7670K
The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 847 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 520 scores 861 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K reaches 847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 520 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 520) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Raw compute: 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 861+2% | 847 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1024+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.3456 TFLOPS | 1.997 TFLOPS+478% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 975 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 520 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 520 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7670K's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 520) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 57.4+575% | 8.5 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K launched at $118 and now averages $50. The HD Graphics 520 costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.6 (HD Graphics 520) vs 16.9 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 45.6% better value.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon R7 A8-7670K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-15% | $118 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-30% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6+46% | 16.9 |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | Trinidad |
| Release | September 1 2015 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #929 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














