HD Graphics 520
VS
Radeon R7 A8-7670K

HD Graphics 520 vs Radeon R7 A8-7670K

HD Graphics 520

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The HD Graphics 520 is positioned at rank 389 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K is on rank 176, so the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 520

#379
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1261%
#381
1143%
#382
1140%
#386
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1037%
#387
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1030%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
100%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
99%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
98%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
98%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
93%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
#404
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A8-7670K

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1010%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
971%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
959%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
958%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
956%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
950%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
938%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
935%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
926%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
924%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
913%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
911%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
894%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
894%
#93
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#94
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
95%
#95
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
94%
#161
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1114%
#176
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $50
100%
#177
Radeon HD 6570
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
98%
#178
Radeon HD 8370D
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
98%
#181
Radeon HD 8310E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#183
GeForce GT 610
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#185
Radeon HD 6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#186
Radeon HD 8450G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
93%
#187
Radeon HD 4830
MSRP: $130|Avg: $20
93%
#188
GeForce GT 140
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
93%
#189
GeForce GT 530
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
92%
#190
GeForce GT 620
MSRP: $59|Avg: $20
92%
#191
Radeon R7 A8-7600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $25
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The HD Graphics 520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The HD Graphics 520 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 520 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 45.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+45.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($35)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 520 and Radeon R7 A8-7670K

Intel

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7670K

The Radeon R7 A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 847 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 520 scores 861 and the Radeon R7 A8-7670K reaches 847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 520 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 520) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Raw compute: 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
G3D Mark Score
861+2%
847
Architecture
Generation 9.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm+
28 nm
Shading Units
192
1024+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.3456 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+478%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
975 MHz+8%
ROPs
3
32+967%
TMUs
24
64+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 520 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 A8-7670K offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 520 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7670K's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 520) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7670K). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
TDP
15W-85%
100W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
57.4+575%
8.5
💰

Value Analysis

The HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon R7 A8-7670K launched at $118 and now averages $50. The HD Graphics 520 costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.6 (HD Graphics 520) vs 16.9 (Radeon R7 A8-7670K) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 45.6% better value.

FeatureHD Graphics 520Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP
$100-15%
$118
Avg Price (30d)
$35-30%
$50
Performance per Dollar
24.6+46%
16.9
Codename
Skylake GT2
Trinidad
Release
September 1 2015
June 18 2015
Ranking
#929
#467