Radeon R7 M260
VS
GRID K180Q

Radeon R7 M260 vs GRID K180Q

AMD

Radeon R7 M260

2015Core: 620 MHzBoost: 715 MHz
VS

GRID K180Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M260 is positioned at rank 486 and the GRID K180Q is on rank 381, so the GRID K180Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M260

#476
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2267%
#478
2055%
#479
2049%
#483
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1863%
#484
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1851%
#486
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
100%
#487
100%
#488
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
100%
#489
100%
#490
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#491
99%
#492
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#493
98%
#494
98%
#495
94%
#496
Radeon HD 8180
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
94%
#498
Radeon R8 M535DX
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#500
Radeon R5 230
MSRP: $50|Avg: $25
93%
#501
GeForce 9300 GE
MSRP: $23|Avg: $25
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K180Q

#366
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
27874%
#381
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
100%
#382
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
100%
#383
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
89%
#384
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
83%
#385
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
81%
#386
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
81%
#387
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
79%
#388
GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
79%
#389
GRID M10-0Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
75%
#390
GRID V100-2Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000
72%
#391
Quadro FX 560
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
72%
#392
Quadro FX 5800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40
66%
#393
FireStream 9170
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20
60%
#394
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
60%
#395
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
58%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
57%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID K180Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M260 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 M260GRID K180Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M260 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M260 holds the technical lead. Priced at $110 (vs $1,000), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 797.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 M260GRID K180Q
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+797.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($110)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M260 and GRID K180Q

AMD

Radeon R7 M260

The Radeon R7 M260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 527 points.

NVIDIA

GRID K180Q

The GRID K180Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 534 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M260 scores 527 and the GRID K180Q reaches 534 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID K180Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M260) vs 1,536 (GRID K180Q). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K180Q).

FeatureRadeon R7 M260GRID K180Q
G3D Mark Score
527
534+1%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS+317%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L1 Cache
96 KB
128 KB+33%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M260GRID K180Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M260 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K180Q has 512 MB. The Radeon R7 M260 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260) vs 512 KB (GRID K180Q) — the GRID K180Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 M260GRID K180Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M260 draws 75W versus the GRID K180Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 M260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M260) vs 350W (GRID K180Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 M260GRID K180Q
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
7.0+192%
2.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M260 launched at $110 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the GRID K180Q launched at $1000 and now averages $1000. The Radeon R7 M260 costs 89% less ($890 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.8 (Radeon R7 M260) vs 0.5 (GRID K180Q) — the Radeon R7 M260 offers 860% better value. The Radeon R7 M260 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 M260GRID K180Q
MSRP
$110-89%
$1000
Avg Price (30d)
$110-89%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
4.8+860%
0.5
Codename
Opal
GK104
Release
December 6 2015
June 28 2013
Ranking
#878
#595