
Radeon R7 M260

Radeon Vega 3 3020e
Radeon R7 M260 vs Radeon Vega 3 3020e Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 M260 vs Radeon Vega 3 3020e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Radeon R7 M260 vs Radeon Vega 3 3020e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 M260
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Vega 3 3020e is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 M260 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Vega 3 3020e across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon Vega 3 3020e
2018Why buy it
- ✅70.5% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M260 vs Radeon Vega 3 3020e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 M260
The Radeon R7 M260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 527 points.

Radeon Vega 3 3020e
The Radeon Vega 3 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1283 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 535 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M260 scores 527 and the Radeon Vega 3 3020e reaches 535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Vega 3 3020e uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M260) vs 1,280 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260) vs 3.284 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Boost clocks: 715 MHz vs 1283 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260 | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 527 | 535+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 3.284 TFLOPS+498% |
| Boost Clock | 715 MHz | 1283 MHz+79% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 320 KB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260 | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M260 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 3020e carries 0 MB. Radeon R7 M260 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260 and System on the Radeon Vega 3 3020e. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M260) vs 1 MB (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) — the Radeon Vega 3 3020e has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260 | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R7 M260) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260 | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M260) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Vega 3 3020e).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260 | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M260 draws 75W versus the Radeon Vega 3 3020e's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R7 M260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M260) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 3020e). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260 | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.0+32% | 5.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 M260 came in at $110, while the Radeon Vega 3 3020e launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 3 3020e was 100+% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (Radeon R7 M260) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 3020e) — the Radeon Vega 3 3020e offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 3 3020e (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260 | Radeon Vega 3 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | Opal | Vega 12 |
| Release | December 6 2015 | November 14 2018 |
| Ranking | #878 | #435 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














