
Radeon R7 M260DX
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M260DX is positioned at rank 604 and the Radeon HD 7670 is on rank 401, so the Radeon HD 7670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M260DX
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 M260DX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M260DX | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7670 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7670 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $300), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1079.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M260DX | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1079.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M260DX and Radeon HD 7670

Radeon R7 M260DX
The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.

Radeon HD 7670
The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M260DX scores 817 and the Radeon HD 7670 reaches 803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M260DX is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7670). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260DX | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 817+2% | 803 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5491 TFLOPS | 0.576 TFLOPS+5% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+100% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260DX | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M260DX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7670 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260DX | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M260DX draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7670's 45W — a 50% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7670). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260DX | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 45W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.9 | 17.8+63% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M260DX launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon HD 7670 launched at $100 and now averages $25. The Radeon HD 7670 costs 91.7% less ($275 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 32.1 (Radeon HD 7670) — the Radeon HD 7670 offers 1088.9% better value. The Radeon R7 M260DX is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M260DX | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $100-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $25-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 32.1+1089% |
| Codename | Opal | Turks |
| Release | December 6 2015 | January 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #878 | #870 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















