Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R9 M280X

AMD

Radeon R7 M260DX

2015Core: 620 MHzBoost: 715 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R9 M280X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R9 M280X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R9 M280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 M260DX

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 20% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M280X

2013

Why buy it

  • 111.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 19.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M280X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 111.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M260DX instead at 817 vs 814, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 M260DX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M280X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 19.6% (3.3 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M280X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 M260DX has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R9 M280X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 M260DX

The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M280X

The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M260DX scores 817 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M260DX is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X). Boost clocks: 715 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 M260DXRadeon R9 M280X
G3D Mark Score
817
814
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS+646%
Boost Clock
715 MHz
1000 MHz+40%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L1 Cache
96 KB
512 KB+433%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M260DXRadeon R9 M280X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M260DX has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M280X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260DX and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M280X. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R9 M280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 M260DXRadeon R9 M280X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
80 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M260DX draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R7 M260DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R7 M260DXRadeon R9 M280X
TDP
75W-63%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
10.9+166%
4.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 M260DX came in at $300, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M280X was 16.7% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R9 M280X offers 22.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260DX (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 M260DXRadeon R9 M280X
MSRP
$300
$250-17%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
3.3+22%
Codename
Opal
Tahiti
Release
December 6 2015
October 8 2013
Ranking
#878
#404

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.