GeForce GT 635
Radeon R7 M260DX
GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R7 M260DX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R7 M260DX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R7 M260DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 635
2010Why buy it
- ✅82.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 200.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
- ❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R7 M260DX
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 635 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌203% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R7 M260DX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 635
The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.
Radeon R7 M260DX
The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 635 scores 810 and the Radeon R7 M260DX reaches 817 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 M260DX uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 635) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 810 | 817 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 384+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS+56% | 0.5491 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 44+83% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+633% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 635 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M260DX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 635 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260DX. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 635) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260DX) — the GeForce GT 635 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 635) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 635) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 635 draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 M260DX's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R7 M260DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 200W (GeForce GT 635) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 200W-43% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.0 | 10.9+173% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 635 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 M260DX launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GT 635 was 67% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GT 635) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) — the GeForce GT 635 offers 203.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260DX (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 M260DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-67% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+204% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GF100 | Opal |
| Release | May 31 2010 | December 6 2015 |
| Ranking | #618 | #878 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 635 and Radeon R7 M260DX
