GeForce GT 635
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
GeForce GT 635 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 635 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GT 635 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 635
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GT 635 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021−2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 635 vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 635
The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 16 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 800 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 635 scores 810 and the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635 is built on Fermi while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 635) vs 16 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 810+1% | 800 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 352+2100% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 635 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 635 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 635 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 635 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 635) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 635) vs Quick Sync 8 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs Quick Sync 8. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 635) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | Quick Sync 8 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | Quick Sync 8 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 635 draws 200W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 172.1% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 200W (GeForce GT 635) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 200W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.0 | 53.3+1233% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 635 came in at $99, while the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GT 635) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (2021 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 31 2010 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #618 | #917 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 635 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
