GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R9 M280X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R9 M280X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R9 M280X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 635

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 151.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M280X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M280X

2013

Why buy it

✅15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
152.5% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M280X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (814 vs 810), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 635 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 635 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 151.3% (8.2 vs 3.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M280X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R9 M280X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 635

The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon R9 M280X

The Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 814 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 635 scores 810 and the Radeon R9 M280X reaches 814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 635) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M280X). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M280X).

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon R9 M280X
G3D Mark Score	810	814
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	352	2048+482%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+379%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	44	128+191%
L1 Cache	704 KB+38%	512 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 635 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M280X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon R9 M280X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 635 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M280X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M280X gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 635 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M280X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 635) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 M280X) — the Radeon R9 M280X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon R9 M280X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	80 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 635 draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 M280X's 200W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 200W (GeForce GT 635) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M280X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon R9 M280X
TDP	200W	200W
Recommended PSU	200W-43%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.0	4.1+2%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 635 came in at $99, while the Radeon R9 M280X launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GT 635 was 60.4% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GT 635) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M280X) — the GeForce GT 635 offers 148.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M280X (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP	$99-60%	$250
Performance per Dollar	8.2+148%	3.3
Codename	GF100	Tahiti
Release	May 31 2010	October 8 2013
Ranking	#618	#404

Search GeForce GT 635 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M280X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.