GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon HD 7670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon HD 7670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon HD 7670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 635

2010

Why buy it

✅84.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌344.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 7670

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 200W, a 155W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 635 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$99 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 635 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 84.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (810 vs 803), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 635 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 635 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.9% (8.2 vs 8.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon HD 7670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 635

The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon HD 7670

The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 635 scores 810 and the Radeon HD 7670 reaches 803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 635) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7670). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670).

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon HD 7670
G3D Mark Score	810	803
Architecture	Fermi	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	352	480+36%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS+49%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	44+83%	24
L1 Cache	704 KB+1367%	48 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 635 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon HD 7670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 635 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7670 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 7670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 635 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7670. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 635) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7670) — the GeForce GT 635 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon HD 7670
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 635 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 7670's 45W — a 126.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 200W (GeForce GT 635) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7670). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon HD 7670
TDP	200W	45W-78%
Recommended PSU	200W-43%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.0	17.8+345%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 635 came in at $99, while the Radeon HD 7670 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce GT 635 was 1% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GT 635) vs 8.0 (Radeon HD 7670) — the GeForce GT 635 offers 2.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7670 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 635	Radeon HD 7670
MSRP	$99-1%	$100
Performance per Dollar	8.2+2%	8.0
Codename	GF100	Turks
Release	May 31 2010	January 5 2012
Ranking	#618	#870

Search GeForce GT 635 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.