
GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon HD 7670

GeForce GT 635
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 635 is positioned at rank 152 and the Radeon HD 7670 is on rank 401, so the GeForce GT 635 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 635
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 635 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7670 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 635 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 635 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $25), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 26.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 635 and Radeon HD 7670

GeForce GT 635
The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.

Radeon HD 7670
The Radeon HD 7670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 635 scores 810 and the Radeon HD 7670 reaches 803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635 is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 7670 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 635) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7670). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 810 | 803 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 480+36% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS+49% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 44+83% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+1367% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 635 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7670 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 635) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7670) — the GeForce GT 635 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 635 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 7670's 45W — a 126.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 200W (GeForce GT 635) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7670). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 45W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 200W-43% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.0 | 17.8+345% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 635 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 7670 launched at $100 and now averages $25. The GeForce GT 635 costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.5 (GeForce GT 635) vs 32.1 (Radeon HD 7670) — the GeForce GT 635 offers 26.2% better value. The Radeon HD 7670 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon HD 7670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-1% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-20% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.5+26% | 32.1 |
| Codename | GF100 | Turks |
| Release | May 31 2010 | January 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #618 | #870 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












