GeForce GT 635
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 635
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 71.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅15.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌70.7% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 635 vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GT 635
The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 806 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 635 scores 810 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 reaches 806 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 635 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 uses Bristol Ridge, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 635) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 810 | 806 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 4096+1064% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+5493% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 44 | 256+482% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 635 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 635 and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 635) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 8 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 635) vs 12 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 635) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (1st Gen) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 635 draws 200W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700's 300W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GT 635 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 200W (GeForce GT 635) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-33% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 200W-43% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 4.0+48% | 2.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 635 came in at $99, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce GT 635 was 41.4% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GT 635) vs 4.8 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700) — the GeForce GT 635 offers 70.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 635 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-41% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+71% | 4.8 |
| Codename | GF100 | Navi 48 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #618 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 635 and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
