Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R7 M365X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R7 M365X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R7 M365X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 M260DX

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M365X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M365X

2016

Why buy it

✅13.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M365X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (824 vs 817), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 M260DX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M365X makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $300 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.9% (2.7 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M365X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 M260DX has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 M260DX vs Radeon R7 M365X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 M260DX

The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.

Radeon R7 M365X

The Radeon R7 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 824 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M260DX scores 817 and the Radeon R7 M365X reaches 824 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M260DX is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 512 (Radeon R7 M365X). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M365X). Boost clocks: 715 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 M365X
G3D Mark Score	817	824
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5491 TFLOPS	0.9472 TFLOPS+73%
Boost Clock	715 MHz	925 MHz+29%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	96 KB	128 KB+33%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 M365X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260DX and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M365X.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 M365X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M365X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 M365X
DirectX	12_0	12 (11_1)
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M365X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 3.1.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 M365X
Encoder	VCE 2.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 4.2	UVD 3.1
Codecs	—	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M260DX draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 M365X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 M365X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M365X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 M365X
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	Mobile
Length	1mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	10.9	11.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 M260DX came in at $300, while the Radeon R7 M365X launched at $300. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M365X) — the Radeon R7 M365X offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 M365X (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R7 M260DX	Radeon R7 M365X
MSRP	$300	$300
Performance per Dollar	2.7	2.7
Codename	Opal	Tropo
Release	December 6 2015	May 15 2016
Ranking	#878	#715

Search Radeon R7 M260DX on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M365X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.