GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R7 M260DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R7 M260DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R7 M260DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-0Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R7 M260DX

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M60-0Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (827 vs 817), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M60-0Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M260DX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M260DX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M60-0Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-0Q vs Radeon R7 M260DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-0Q

The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

Radeon R7 M260DX

The Radeon R7 M260DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 817 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-0Q scores 827 and the Radeon R7 M260DX reaches 817 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 M260DX uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0Q) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260DX). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 715 MHz.

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon R7 M260DX
G3D Mark Score	827+1%	817
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+433%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+779%	0.5491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+65%	715 MHz
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	128+433%	24
L1 Cache	768 KB+700%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon R7 M260DX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-0Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260DX. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-0Q) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M260DX) — the GRID M60-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon R7 M260DX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon R7 M260DX
DirectX	12_1	12_0
Max Displays	0	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GRID M60-0Q) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M260DX). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon R7 M260DX
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	UVD 4.2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R7 M260DX's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 M260DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0Q) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260DX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon R7 M260DX
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	267mm	1mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Perf/Watt	3.7	10.9+195%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-0Q came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 M260DX launched at $300. On MSRP, GRID M60-0Q was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M60-0Q) vs 2.7 (Radeon R7 M260DX) — the GRID M60-0Q offers Infinity% better value.

Feature	GRID M60-0Q	Radeon R7 M260DX
MSRP	$0-100%	$300
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	2.7
Codename	GM204	Opal
Release	August 30 2015	December 6 2015
Ranking	#433	#878

Search GRID M60-0Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260DX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.